resources: kerione-why-anchored-signatures
This data as json
| id | type | name | url | maintainer | status | last_checked | date | year | level | evidence | access | abstract | authors | series | chair | minutes | recording | media | decisions | version | language | license | release | pushed | depends | since | via | summary | note | has_abstract | has_summary | kind | sector | country | products |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kerione-why-anchored-signatures | paper | Why Anchored Signatures? | https://dhh1128.github.io/papers/was.html | Daniel Hardman | quiet | 2026-10-14 | practitioner | informative | public | A short paper by Daniel Hardman explaining why a bare digital signature is weak evidence once a key may be stolen or rotated, and how anchoring each signing event in a tamper-evident record of key state closes the window for backdated forgeries. It uses KERI key event logs and transaction event logs as the worked solution. For practitioners designing evidence that must survive key rotation. | Daniel Hardman | 1.1 (item CC-PRI-250201) | keri-one-resources | research/papers/why-anchored-signatures | 1 | 1 |