resources: hardman-analysis-of-did-cel-heartbeat-relevance-to-keri
This data as json
| id | type | name | url | maintainer | status | last_checked | date | year | level | evidence | access | abstract | authors | series | chair | minutes | recording | media | decisions | version | language | license | release | pushed | depends | since | via | summary | note | has_abstract | has_summary | kind | sector | country | products |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hardman-analysis-of-did-cel-heartbeat-relevance-to-keri | paper | Analysis of did:cel Heartbeat: Relevance to KERI | https://dhh1128.github.io/papers/heartbeat-and-witnesses.html | Daniel Hardman | quiet | 2026-10-15 | 2025-12-20 | 2025 | practitioner | informative | public | A short 2025 analysis by Daniel Hardman of the heartbeat mechanism in the did:cel DID method, a periodic controller signature against retrograde (history-rewriting) attacks, and of whether KERI needs one. It concludes that KERI's pre-rotation and witness-based duplicity detection already cover the threat while allowing cold, offline keys. It is for readers comparing DID methods with KERI. | Daniel Hardman | 1.1 | hardman-papers | research/papers/hardman-analysis-of-did-cel-heartbeat-relevance-to-keri | 1 | 1 |