direct-mode [ relation ]
AI–generated Summary
KREI employs a one-to-one trust mode where the identity controller gains control through verified signatures of the controlling key-pair.
Definition
Two primary trust modalities motivated the KERI design, One of these is the direct (one-to-one) mode, in which the identity controller establishes control via verified signatures of the controlling key-pair. The direct mode doesn't use witnesses nor KERL+s, but has direct (albeit intermittent) network contact with the validator.
Operational mode
To protect a validator+ when engaging with some other controller’s identifier, be it verification+, control authority establishment, or duplicity+ detection, are based on an ability to replay the sequence of key events (key event history or log) of that identifier. There are two main operational modes for providing replay capability that are distinguished by the degree of availability of the identifier’s controller when creating and promulgating the key events. With direct mode, the promulgation of events to a validator does not happen unless the controller is attached to the network and able to communicate directly with a validator. Direct mode assumes that the controller may have intermittent network availability, it also assumes that these mechanism may not be trusted in any persistent sense to promulgate key events. Nonetheless, direct mode is important as it is compatible with the use of mobile internet devices such as cell phones. A single direct mode identifier may be re-used in multiple one-to-one relationships as part of a select group. More in Source: chapter Protocol Operational Modes in KERI white paper
Security concerns
The protocol may operate in two basic modes, called direct and indirect. The availability and consistency attack surfaces are different for the two modes and hence the mitigation properties of the protocol are likewise mode specific.
Also see
Indirect mode+